|  
                
                  
                    |  |  |  
                    | 
  
         Return to top  View 
                      Actual State Sample Subscribe Now     | 
 
                        
                          | 
                            
                              |  |  
                              | 
                                
                                  |  | Lien Law  Online eLert for Georgia 3-2008 |  
                                  | 
 Hampshire Homes, Inc. v. Espinosa Construction Services, Inc., 28 Ga. App. 718 (2007)
 
 |  
                                  |  |  |  
                                  | In  the above case, the general contractor voluntarily dismissed a lien  previously filed against the Owner’s property.  At the trial of the  case, the owner argued that the contractor’s release of its lien rights  effectively waived the contractor’s right to sue the owner on the  contract.  The trial court and the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled in  favor of the general contractor.  The court found that pursuing a lien  on the owner’s property is only one avenue available to a contractor or  subcontractor to collect on unpaid invoices for construction work.   Pursuing lien rights, and then abandoning that avenue, does not  eliminate other avenues (e.g., a breach of contract action) of pursuing  the underlying debt.  A release of a lien releases the lien; it does  not necessarily release the underlying debt.  The case confirms prior understanding of the Georgia law in this regard.
                                       
 |  
                                  |  | Lien Law  Online eLert for Illinois 2-2008 |  
                                  | 
 Illinois Now Allows for Liens for Equipment Rental Equipment in Most Cases
 
 
 |  
                                  |  |  |  
                                  | The Illinois Mechanics Lien Act was amended in 2007 to permit   liens for the value of rental equipment used on non-residential   projects.  Specifically, the Act now provides that "any person...who   leases construction equipment to another for use in the process of constructing   a specific improvement to real estate, has a lien for the rental value of the   construction equipment," but only to the extent that "the equipment is   used on or about the site of the improvement."  Case law also suggests that   the value of rental equipment can be included in the lien claim amount, even if   the rental equipment would not otherwise be lienable, if the rental was intregal   to the lienable work.  For example, Illinois courts held that a concrete mix   supplier could include truck rental costs in the amount of its lien claim   because that concrete could not be mixed or preserved without the truck.
                                       
 |  |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Washington 1-2008 |  
                                      | 
 
 |  
                                      |  |  |  
                                      | This is a reminder of a change in the State of Washington statutes regarding   the "Notice to Customer" requirement under RCW 18.27.114. 
 Contractors required to provide the Notice to Customer prior to   commencing work must maintain a signed (by the owner) copy of that notice for a   minimum of three (3) years and must produce a signed or electronic   signature copy of the notice to the Department of Labor and Industries (the   agency responsible for overseeing contractor registration) upon the Department's   request.  This is important because under the same statute, the failure to   maintain the notice (or provide a copy) shall be considered an infraction under   the Contractor Registration Act.  Whether or not such failure impacts a   contractor's right to claim a lien is unclear. 
 |  
                                      |  | Lien Law  Online eLert for Tennessee 5-2007 |  
                                      | 
 
 |  
                                      |  |  |  
                                      | Below is a reprint of an article on recent changes to the Tennessee Lien Law Statutes that was published in Bricks in the Wall, a publication of the Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz law firm (bakerdonelson.com).  Thanks go to Mr. Cameron Hill, Esq., a shareholder in Baker Donelson and Contributing Author of the Tennessee chapter of LienlawOnline for writing this article and granting permission to reprint it for your information. Changes to Tennessee Lien Law Statute The  Tennessee General Assembly recently modified the mechanics’ and  materialmen's lien statutes, and the changes became effective on May  18, 2007. While some of the changes simply codify how Tennessee  courts had handled various issues arising under the statutes, other  changes are materially different from the procedures contractors and  owners are accustomed to following.  The  list below is not intended to be an exhaustive outline of the changes  made to the statute. It is intended to identify certain, limited  changes and to give you notice that you should pay particular attention  to and learn about the new procedures you should follow under the  revised statute.  
                                            The  new statute is to be "construed and applied liberally." T.C.A. §  66-11-148(a). This is a change from the former "strict construction" to  a more "liberal construction." Under the changes, "substantial  compliance" is all that is necessary to satisfy the lien statutes.  T.C.A. § 66-11-148(b). Do not let this apparent relaxed approach,  however, lull you into thinking you do not have to meet the fundamental  requirements of the statute. The  statute now includes a definition of "remote contractor," which opens  up the provisions of the lien statutes to a broader group of claimants  than under the old provisions. T.C.A. § 66-11-101(14) and T.C.A. §  66-11-102(a). The  "gap period," which formerly allowed a lien claimant to file a Notice  of Lien and Sworn Statement either 90 days after the date work is  completed or 90 days after completion of the project, no longer exists.  Under the new statute, the Notice of Lien and Sworn Statement must be  filed no later than 90 days after the date the improvement is complete  or is abandoned. T.C.A. § 66-11-112(a). Your  Notice of Nonpayment now must be sent within 90 days of the last day of  each month within which work or labor was provided. T.C.A. §  66-11-145(a). If  the owner provides a Payment Bond equaling 100% of the prime  contractor's contract price, an attachment on the real property is not  necessary after the Payment Bond has been recorded. T.C.A. § §  66-11-124 and 126(5). To  effect your lien rights where there is a Payment Bond, however, it  appears still necessary to follow the procedures for giving notice of  your lien rights because, even when there is an effective Payment Bond,  defendants retain all defenses to the validity of the underlying lien.  T.C.A. § 66-11-126(5)(C). Any required Attachment Bond must be in the amount of $1,000. T.C.A. § 66-11-126(4). Under  the new statute, if the lien claimant is a remote contractor, it is no  longer necessary to sue the prime contractor or other entity with which  the remote contractor has a contract in order to preserve the remote  contractor's lien rights. T.C.A. § 66-11-126(2). For purposes of a  claim for quantum meruit, however, the prime contractor should still be  sued. Neither  a prime contractor nor a remote contractor of a lessee of real property  may encumber the owner's rights to the property unless the lessee is  first determined to be the owner's agent. T.C.A. § 66-11-102(d). It  now is clear under the statute that to "furnish materials" includes  supplying tools, equipment, or machinery (T.C.A. § 66-11-101(4)(e)) and  a claimant may bring a lien for furnishing tools, equipment, or  machinery only to the extent permitted by the statute. T.C.A. §  66-11-102(g). Prior  additional hurdles for architects and engineers, requiring special  notice to the lender to have priority over the mortgage, have been  eliminated. T.C.A. § 66-11-102(c)(2).   |  |  |  
                                        
                   
                          |  |  |  
                    | Return to top  View 
                  Actual State Sample Subscribe Now     
 | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law  Online eLert for New Mexico 5-2007 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | The New Mexico legislature has passed modifications to the New Mexico Mechanics’ and Materialmen’s Lien Law.  The  amendments were proposed by several industry associations working  together with the goal to clarify issues that had been troubling in  application of the statute.  These amendments have an effective date of July 1, 2007.
 Many of the changes only clarify the language of the statute, but several are substantive. 1.  As  an alternative to commencing an action in the District Court before the  end of two years, the 2007 amendments allow the action to be commenced  in a binding arbitration. 2.  The right to petition the Court to remove a lien from real property to  other security may now be brought by an original contractor as well as  an owner.  There must be separate security for each lien that has been removed.   3.  A  contingent payment clause, “pay if paid,” shall not be construed as a  waiver of the right to file and enforce a mechanics’ or materialmen’s  lien. 4.  The  statutory requirement that the contractor had a duty to defend any  suits by its subcontractors or suppliers has been deleted.   |  |  |  
                    |     Return to top  View 
                        Actual State Sample Subscribe Now                                         Return to top  View 
                      Actual State Sample Subscribe Now | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law  Online eLert for Florida 7-2007 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | Following  the 2007 legislative session, the State of Florida enacted two bills  that made significant changes to Florida's construction lien and  construction bonding statutes.   The following is a summary of the  changes and additions to the lien law law statues.
                                
 I. CONSTRUCTION LIEN STATUTE     A.  SENATE BILL 2768/HOUSE BILL 1285:   This bill, referred to as the 2007 construction lien law glitch  bill, amended several existing construction lien statutes contained  in  Chapter 713, Florida Statutes.  The effective date of the statutory  changes is July 1, 2007.              1.  Section 713.01,  Florida Statues, provides the definitions of the terms used in the lien  law.  This section has been amended as follows:                     a)   The statute now defines "final furnishing" as the last date that  the lienor furnishes labor, services, or materials and does not include  correction of deficiencies in the lienor's previously performed work or  materials supplied.  The revised statute now specifies that the date of  final furnishing may not be measured by other standards, such as the  issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the issuance of a certificate  of final completion.  With respect to rental equipment, the revised  statute specifies that the term "final furnishing" means the date that  the rental equipment was last on the job site and available for use.                      b)  Amends the definition of "furnish materials" to include the delivery of  rental equipment to the site of improvement as prima facie evidence of  the period of the actual use of the rental equipment from the delivery  through the time the equipment is last available for use at the site,  or 2 business days after the lessor of the rental equipment receives a  written notice from the owner or the lessee of the rental equipment to  pick up the equipment, whichever occurs first.             2.   Section 713.012 is a new statute.  It was added to clarify that all  lien notices, demands, or requests permitted or required under Chapter  713 must be in writing.              3.  Section 713.015 is a  consumer protection statute that must be complied with for all single  and multi-family projects not exceeding 4 units.  This statute has been  amended to clarify that the mandatory warning notice for direct  contracts between an owner and contractor now applies to direct  contracts exceeding $2,500.00.  There are minor changes to the form of  the mandatory warning notice.  If a contract is written, the notice  must be in the contract documents.  For written contracts, the notice  must be provided in a document referencing the contract.  Finally, the  failure to provide the written notice does not bar the enforcement of a  lien against a person who has not been adversely affected.             4.   Section 713.07 was amended to provide for the recommencement of  construction following the termination of the direct contract.             5.   Section 713.08 was amended to state that claims of lien may be prepared  by the lienor or the lienor's employee or attorney.  There were also  revisions to the 90 day limitation for recording a lien where the  original contract is terminated.             6.  Section 713.13 was amended as follows:                     a)  The notice of commencement must include the tax folio number.                     b)  A  new warning that must be included on the notice of commencement form  regarding improper payments under the lien law.  Also provides that the  notice of commencement must be recorded and posted on the job site.                     c)  Requiring the notice of commencement to be notarized verified and acknowledged.                     d)   Subsections 713.13(5)(a) and 5(b) was created to clarify when a notice  of commencement may be amended.  In order to change contractors, a new  notice of commencement or notice of recommencement must be executed and  recorded.  The amended notice must also identify the original notice of  commencement by book and page number, and must be served on the  contractor and all lienors who serve notice before or within 30 days  after the amended notice is recorded.             7. Section  713.135 was amended to require that building permits contain a warning  regarding the recording of a notice of commencement.             8.  Section 713.16 was amended to emphasize that statements of account must be under oath.             9.  Section 713.18 was amended to provide procedures for service of notices upon a limited liability company.            10.   Section 713.22 was amended to extend the duration of liens when an  amended claim of lien showing a later date of final furnishing is filed.            11.  Section 713.31 was amended to provide for the award of attorney's fees and costs in fraudulent lien actions.   |  |  |  
                    |     Return to top  View 
                        Actual State Sample Subscribe Now | 
                              
                                
                                  |  | Lien Law Online eLert for North   Carolina 1-2006 |  
                                  | 
 
 |  
                                  |  |  |  
                                  | Last week, the North Carolina Supreme Court rendered a   decision in O & M INDUSTRIES v. SMITH ENGINEERING COMPANY (No.502PA04) that   clearly determines the issue of payment over (in disregard of) a Notice of Claim   of Lien on Funds-an issue that has been in the law for some time, but one that   the Supreme Court has not ruled on before.
 The main point of the decision   is that once a general contractor or owner receives a Notice of Claim of Lien on   Funds (or Claim of Lien on Funds as revised in 2005), the receipant of the   notice incurs personal liability by the mere act of making payment to the lien   claimant's debtor, without making provision to see that the claimant is paid.   This holds true even in the case where the notice receipant retains sufficient   funds to cover the claim of lien on funds.
 
 When presented with a Claim of   Lien on Funds, caution is warranted so as not to incur personal liability   (having to pay for the amount twice!)
 
 
 |  |  
                    |       | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Georgia 12-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                |                                   In mid 2005, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down a decision   that, at first glance, did not cause much concern in the lien law circles;   however, lately some questions have arisen from subscribers that warrant   discussion.
 The case involved a lien claim by an equipment supplier   (Supplier) who supplied equipment used to connect a sewer main in a public   right-of-way to a newly-established sewer system of a private residential   subdivision. The Supplier liened the private subdivision for the rental value of   the equipment supplied to make the sewer line connection in the public   right-of-way.
 
 The Court ruled that off-site work may not be considered an   "improvement to the property" such as to qualify under the Georgia lien statute.   In order for labor, material or equipment supplied to qualify as an   "improvement" to private property (so as to qualify for lien rights), the   supplied materials, equipment or services must go into, and become part of, the   private property improvement. The fact that the work in the public right-of-way   was necessary in order to complete the improvement on the private property did   not overcome this strict reading by the Court of Appeals of the Georgia lien   statute.
 
 Please be aware of this strict intrepretation as you evaluate   future contract risks.
 
 
 |  |  |  
                    |     Return to top  View 
                  Actual State Sample Subscribe Now | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Arkansas 11-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | MATERIALMAN’S LIEN   LAW CHANGES BECOME EFFECTIVE
 Act 2287 of 2005 amended several provisions   of the Arkansas Materialman’s Lien Act. While most of the changes simply added   options for delivery of notices, one change is more substantive. Act 2287   eliminated the “direct sale” exception to the 10-day notice requirement, i.e.   before the filing of a lien. The “direct sale” exception excused those parties   which had a “direct sale” with the property owner from providing the 10-day   notice. Oddly, however, the Act did not eliminate the “direct sale” exception   from the 75-day notice requirement.
 
 
 |  |  |  
                    |  | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Maine 8-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | Effective September   15, 2005, the Maine mechanic's lien statutes are amended to require all   contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers to file a Notice of Lien in the   registry of deeds for the county in which the real estate is located within 90   days of the date of last labor, services or materials supplied to the project.   The owner must be sent a copy of the Notice of Lien by "ordinary mail." A post   office receipt of mailing is deeded conclusive proof of receipt by the   Owner.
 Further, a certificate from the clerk of court in which the action   is pending should be filed in the registry of deeds within 60 days of the date   on which the lien complaint was filed. An attested copy of the lien complaint or   an affidavit from the claimant or claimant's attorney can be substituted for the   clerk's certificate.
 
 The Notice of Lien filing is required of all   claimants, including those with a direct contract with the Owner.
 
 The   Maine chapter will be updated prior to the effective date of September 15, 2005.   Please review the chapter for a comprehensive discussion of all the changes   before the effective date.
 
 
 |  |  |  
                    |     Return to top                          View 
                  Actual State Sample Subscribe Now | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Texas 7-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | For Texas   construction projects prior to 2005, when an owner terminated a contractor or   when an original contractor abandoned a project, subcontractors needed to act   quickly to preserve their lien rights. Subcontractors needed to send notices of   unpaid amounts and file lien affidavits within 30 days of the termination or   abandonment.
 If they did so they might share in a portion of the owner’s   statutory 10% retainage. If they failed to do so, they may have no lien rights   at all (unless they had previously sent a notice of indebtedness and trapped   money in the owner’s possession). A few weeks ago the Govenor of Texas signed a   bill passed by the Texas Legislature to provide assistance for subcontractors   and suppliers. The bill added a new section 53.107 to the Property Code to   address situations where work is stopped due to termination or abandonment.
 
 As a result of the change to the statute, if a subcontractor advises an   owner that it wishes to be notified of a termination or abandonment, the owner   must provide statutory notice of either occurrence. If an owner fails to provide   this notice after a request, the deadline for a subcontractor to file a lien   against the statutory 10% retainage is not limited to 30 days after termination   or abandonment. This new section applies to projects wherein the prime contract   is signed after September 1, 2005.
 
 Changes to the Texas chapter will be   updated very soon to reflect this change and a new form, Request for Notice of   Termination or Abandonment, will be added.
 
 |  |  |  
                    |  | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Utah 4-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | In 2005, the Utah   legislature made significant changes to provisions of the Utah lien law, the   most notable of which was creation of the centralized State Construction   Registry for the filing of Notices of Commencement, Preliminary Notices, and   Notices of Completion. 
 A notice of commencement must be filed within 15   days of the building permit issuance for all projects. The notice of   commencement should be automatically filed by the local authority issuing the   permit. However, the original contractor should check and verify on the State   Construction Registry that the local authority has filed the notice of   commencement. For projects where no building permit is issued, the original   contractor must file a notice of commencement with the State Construction   Registry within 15 days of beginning physical construction work. If a notice of   commencement is not timely filed, the subcontractor/supplier preliminary notice   provisions and requirements set forth below do not apply.
 
 For   subcontractors and suppliers, a preliminary notice must be filed with the State   Construction Registry before a notice of mechanic’s lien may be recorded.   Subcontractors and suppliers of all tiers must file a preliminary notice within   20 days of its first furnishing labor, equipment, or material to a project or   within 20 days of the filing of the notice of commencement, whichever is later.   Preliminary notices filed after this timeframe only become effective 5 days   after which they are filed and preclude a subcontractor or supplier from filing   a claim for compensation for labor, equipment, or materials furnished prior to   the effective date of the preliminary notice, except as against the person with   whom the subcontractor or supplier contracted. After November 1, 2005, the Utah   preliminary notice requirements no longer exempt residential construction.   Therefore, even subcontractors and suppliers on residential projects must comply   with the statute to preserve their mechanic’s lien filing rights.
 
 Upon   final completion of a project, an owner, lender, or surety related to the   project may file a notice of completion with the State Construction Registry.   “Final completion” means (1) issuance of a permanent certificate of occupancy,   if required; (2) the date of final inspection by the local government entity, if   a permanent certificate of occupancy is not required; or (3) if neither a   permanent certificate of occupancy nor final inspection are required, the date   on which there remains no substantial work to be completed to finish work on the   original contract. However, final completion “does not occur if work remains to   be completed for which the owner is holding payment to ensure completions of   that work.” Upon the filing of the notice of completion, the timeframes for   filing preliminary notices change so that all preliminary notices shall be filed   within ten days of the date on which the notice of completion is filed.
 
 Other changes affect the posting of alternate security for the automatic   release of a mechanic’s lien. Now, the owner, original contractor, or a   subcontractor can post a surety or cash bond for a variable percentage—between   150% and 200%, depending on the amount claimed in the lien—of the principal   amount of the lien claim. Finally, advance written notice is no longer required   prior to filing a notice of mechanic’s lien. These changes effect construction   projects commenced on or after May 1, 2005 (with the exception of preliminary   notices required on residential projects commenced on or after November 1,   2005).
   |  |  |  
                    |     Return to top                          View 
                  Actual State Sample Subscribe Now | 
                      
                        |  |  
                        | 
                            
                              
                                |  | Lien Law Online eLert for Rhode   Island 2-2005 |  
                                | 
 
 |  
                                |  |  |  
                                | In a very   interesting decision that might have serious ramifications regarding the lien   law, a Superior Court in Rhode Island ruled in the case of Desimone Electric,   Inc. v. CMG, Inc., No. C.A. PM 01-6077 that the Rhode Island Lien Law was   UNCONSTITUTIONAL! 
 The Rhode Island Supreme Court is expected to make a   decision within the month on this important matter and a follow-up e-lert will   be sent with the results.
 
 
 |  |  |  |